¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ / v.6, no.1, 2005³â, pp.186-194
Çϵµ±Þ´ë±Ý Á¶Á¤ °ü·Ã ºÐÀïÀÇ ¿¹¹æÀ» À§ÇÑ ¹ý±Ô °³¼±¹æ¾È¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on Improvements of Regulation for the Preventing Commercial Disputes Related to Adjustment of Subcontract Price )
¹Îº´¿í;ÀÌÁ¾±¤;±è¿ë¼ö; Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³´ëÇпø;Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø °ÇÃàÇаú;Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °ÇÃà°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â °Ç¼³°ø»ç Çϵµ±Þ°è¾àÀÇ ´ç»çÀÚÀÎ ¼ö±ÞÀΰú Çϼö±ÞÀΰ£ÀÇ Çϵµ±Þ°è¾à±Ý¾× Á¶Á¤°ú °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¿øÀÎÀ» °ËÅäÇϰí, ºÐÀïÀ» ¿¹¹æÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Çϵµ±Þ´ë±ÝÁ¶Á¤ °ü·Ã ¹ý±ÔÀÇ °³¼±¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹®Ç忬±¸, Çϵµ±Þ°è¾à ¹ý±Ô¿¡ °üÇÑ ±¸Á¶¿Í ¸Æ¶ôÀÇ ºÐ¼® ±×¸®°í ¼³¹®Á¶»çÀÇ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ÁøÇàµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÁÖ¿äÇÑ ¿¬±¸°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. (1) ¹ßÁÖÀÚ¿Í ¼ö±ÞÀÎÀÇ °è¾à±Ý¾× Á¶Á¤ÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´Â °æ¿ì ±× ³»¿ëÀ» Çϼö±ÞÀο¡°Ô ÅëÁöÇϵµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â ÀýÂ÷¿¡ °üÇÑ Á¶Ç×À» Çϵµ±Þ¹ý°ú °Ç¼³Ç¥ÁØÇϵµ±Þ°è¾àÁ¶°Ç¿¡ ±ÔÁ¤ÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. (2) Çϼö±ÞÀÎÀÌ Çϵµ±Þ°è¾à ³»¿ëÀÇ º¯°æ ¹× ±×¿¡ ¼ö¹ÝµÇ´Â Çϵµ±Þ´ë±Ý Á¶Á¤À» û±¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â ÀýÂ÷¸¦ °Ç¼³Ç¥ÁØÇϵµ ±Þ°è¾àÁ¶°Ç¿¡ ±ÔÁ¤ÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. (3) Çϵµ±Þ´ë±Ý Á¶Á¤¿¡ °üÇÑ ±âÁØÀ» ¸íÈ®È÷ Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© °Ç¼³Ç¥ÁØÇϵµ±Þ°è¾àÁ¶°Ç¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â ºÒÈ®Á¤ °³³äÀÎ ´Ü°¡, ³«Âû·ü µî ¿ë¾îÀÇ Á¤ÀǸ¦ ¸íÈ®È÷ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. (4) ¼ö±ÞÀÎÀÇ ±ÍÃ¥À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¿¬Àåºñ¿ëÀÇ ºÎ´ãÀº ¼ö±ÞÀÎÀÌ ºÎ´ãÇϵµ·Ï ÇÏ¿© ºÎ´ãÀÇ ÁÖü¸¦ ¸íÈ®È÷ ÇÏ°í ¿¬Àåºñ¿ëÀÇ »êÁ¤±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÀçÁ¤ °æÁ¦ºÎ Á¦Á¤ ½Çºñ»êÁ¤±ÔÁ¤À» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to examine the problems of the regulations regarding the modification of subcontact price. It also suggests several measures to improve the regulations related to the subcontact price adjustment which help to reduce unnecessary claims and commercial disputes. The literature research, structure and context analysis on the subcontract regulation and survey are adopted as basic research methods. The primary findings of this study are summarized as the following: (1) A provision outlining necessary procedures that an owner and a contractor should notify a subcontract or the adjustment of contact price needs to be made. (2) A provision allowing procedures that subcontactor could make the alteration of subcontract agreement and adjustment of subcontact price needs to be made. (3) The terminology like a unit cost and the rate of contact price needs to be clearly defined in order to improve the criterions of the subcontact price adjustment. (4) The criterions and additional expenses that the contractors ate responsible far need to be defined.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼³°èYE;±â´ÉºÐ¼® Ȱµ¿;À¯ÇüºÐ¼®;±â´ÉºÐ¼® ¹æ¹ýÁ¦¾È;Contract dispute;Adjustment of contract price;subcontract;
 
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.6, no.1, 2005³â, pp.186-194
Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
ISSN : 2005-6095
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200504840811104)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿